THE NORWICH DAY-BOOK.
By the Rev. S. LEVY, M.A.
The Norwich Day-Book is the name given by Jacobs and Wolf,
Bibliotheca Anglo-Judaica, xviii., to four rolls preserved in the
Muniment Room at Westminster Abbey, which contain the trans-
actions of the Norwich Jewish Exchequer day by day for the years
9-11 Hen. III. The documents are mentioned in the Historical
MSS. Commission, Fourth Report, Appendix, p. 182, and have hitherto
been officially known as Nos. 140, 145, 147, and 157; these numbers
being written in dorso of each in pencil. But according to Dr. Scott’s
new catalogue now in process of making, they become Nos. 6686,
6687, 6673, and 9013 respectively. Dr. Scott describes No. 140 as
follows: “Register of bonds for loans due from Christians to Jews,
December to April, 10 H. III.”—a description equally adequate for
the remaining rolls, though the points in which No. 157 differs from
the others will be noted later.
ROLL 140.
This roll consists of two or three membranes sewn end to end,
making an entire length of 25 inches, its width being 8 inches.
Unlike the remaining documents it possesses neither heading nor
endorsement. No doubt at the date of its compilation it formed part
of a larger roll, which, including No. 145, gave a complete year’s
enrolment (10 H. III.), just as No. 147 is a full year’s enrolment for
11 H. III. It has no tag or elongated strip for fastening when
rolled. The first dated entry is given as December 23rd, the last as
243
244 | the norwich Day-book. |
April 26th. The number of entries for each month varies consider-
ably; the lowest number being four for January, and the highest
sixteen for February. The name of the month is given in capitals
and a margin is left for the date—exactly as in the specimen entries
published herewith. The handwriting throughout is apparently the
work of one scribe, and the fact that the document is an enrolment
based upon the original instruments of the loan—tallies, charters,
cyrographs, etc.—explains its contracted nature.
The scribe does not follow in detail the usual methods of con-
traction found in the official documents of the period, for he re-
peatedly gives particles without the slightest contraction mark. The
following may be cited as examples ;—
de stands for the preposition de and also for debit.
da for dabit.
(c) an for annus (and cases).
(d)s for scilicet, solvit, and solvendum.
(more rarely) fit for filius or filia.
In point of formation the letters “a” and “o,” “e,” “t,” and “r,”
bear a great resemblance to one another; so that in the case of place
and proper names, it is often a somewhat difficult matter to decide
with accuracy upon the correct letter. A further peculiarity to be
noticed is the sign which evidently is equivalent to primus. These
peculiarities are common to Nos, 145 and 147; for the same hand is
found, amongst others, in these two rolls.
Nothing in the manner of spelling the names of persons and
places calls for attention. The forms given are almost identical with
those given in the published Close and Patent Rolls for this period of
Henry III.
The entries show but little variation in their character. The
most general form is the notification of a loan, with the name and
place of residence of the borrower together with the name of the
lender, thus: “Walterus, filius Alexandri de Waltham, debit Isaac
filio Jurneti,” etc.
The amount of the loan is then stated, the terms of repayment,
the rate of interest, occasionally the names of the pledges, and the
security given. In addition, notices of fines and repayments are
frequently met with.
the norwich day-book. | 245 |
ROLL 145.
Size 40” by 8.”
This is a continuation for the same year, and as the first entry
is June 5th, the record for the month of May is missing. On the
whole, it is better written, more carefully copied, and contains more
contraction marks. The entries for August 18th and 20th are by a
new hand, the day of the month being given at the conclusion of the
enrolment and not in the margin. The remaining entries for August
and for September 1st and 2nd indicate a further change—either a
return to the original scribe or to a third hand—but several of the
entries for September show a return to hand No. 2. The names of
the month are written in loose capitals and uncials.
There is no change of matter—the enrolments are of the same
nature as already described, and, with the slight exception as to
method of dating, are entered in a similar manner. The following is
given as an endorsement, which supplies the first indication of the
date of the document: “Ann9 Decimus. R. R. Dñi. H. fit. dñi. J.
Regis.”
There still remains a small portion of the tag at the end of the
roll, which formerly served to fasten it.
ROLL 147.
Size 70” by 8”, six membranes, sewn end to end.
This document records a complete year of enrolments, viz.
11 H. III. The first entry is made on the morrow of SS. Simon
and Jude (Nov). The last entry bears the date of October 21st. It
possesses the following heading in elongated capitals, elaborately
drawn:—
“Annus Undecimus R. R. H. Filii. R. Johis. Incept9 die
Simonis t Jude.”
The handwriting, method of entry, and character of entries are
all similar to the rolls already described; the same scribes evidently
being responsible also for this roll.
246 | the norwich day-book. |
Under the date of March 26th we find an entry, which discloses
the name of one of the scribes, for it is written in the first person:
“Ego, Andreas Wascelin, cognosco quod,” etc. The last line of the
roll (Respice ī tergo. Hac Nota) refers to three or four entries which
complete the year.
A further endorsement, written in a Chancery-hand and entered
nine years afterwards (20 H. III.), is to be found referring to the
withdrawal of a certain cyrograph per breve regis. Two tags, 10 inches
and 2 inches, at the bottom of the roll, serve as a means of fastening.
ROLL 157.
Size 100” by 8”, six membranes, sewn as before.
This document clearly belongs to a different series from that of
the three preceding ones. It is written in the Chancery-hand of the
period, commences 9 H. III. and runs to the beginning of 11 H. III.,
thus covering the period already described in the other rolls. It is
very clearly and elegantly written, and bears a resemblance to the
fine writing of the Charter enrolments of the period. Though dealing
with matters of the same nature, the form of entry is very much
shortened; the references to interest, pledges, etc., being much briefer
and in many cases not given at all. Nevertheless the scribe gives in
the first entry the full phrase, “debet reddere” and also “primus
terminus,” which are not given in previous rolls.
The heading is as follows:—
“Annus. Reğ. Henř. fit. Reğ. Johis. Non9. Mensis. April.”
This is the document to which Madox refers in his chapter, “The
Exchequer of the Jews” (vol. i. c. vii. p. 139). He there describes it
as an enrolment of loans, etc.; gives in a foot-note the first entry;
cites also an entry to prove the writer to be one Galfridus de
Qwelnetham, and finally quotes two endorsements, the one in toto,
the other in part. All the quotations given by Madox are printed
herewith, together with other specimen entries of this document.
Madox, however, makes no reference whatever to Rolls 140, 145,
and 147.
These documents, on the one hand, furnish material for the
the norwich day-book. | 247 |
genealogist in exactly the same way as the contemporary Feet of
fines; and, on the other hand, they offer much information concerning
rate of interest and repayment of loans, which may be compared with
other evidence of the same period. Finally, they provide material on
the Jewish side for a comparison with the methods of their great rivals,
the Caursines, who became so active about ten years later (1235).
In writing this Introduction I have received valuable assistance
from Mr. E. F. Churchill, M.A. Mr. Churchill also, at my request,
transcribed the specimen extracts, which were afterwards extended
and translated by Miss E. Salisbury.
248 | the norwich day-book. |
No. 140.
Transcript.
[No date.] | Walterus filius Alexandri de Waltham solvit Isaac filio Jurneti v Alanus de Seniore debet Isaac filio Jurneti xiiij marcas et dabit inde |
[sic.] | Robertus Hauecrin solvit Isaac filio Jurneti c solidos et debet ad Natalem |
xxiij.1 | Willelmus filius Roberti de Reidun’ debet Isaac filio Jurneti xxiiij libras Stephanus de Sparrham modo accipit a Diaie Franceis dimidiam marcam Philippus filius Johannis de Estun’ solvit Isaac filio Jurneti ij marcas et Gilbertus filius Rogeri de Fransham modo accipit a Mosseo filio Abrahe |
Januarius | Eudo de Muleton’ solvit Isaac filio Jurneti triginta solidos et debet x |
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1xxxiij in MS.
the norwich day-book. | 249 |
|
ROLL 140.
Translation.
Walter son of Alexander de Waltham pays Isaac son of Jurnet 5s. and Alan de Senior owes Isaac son of Jurnet 14 marks, and will give as Robert Hauecrin pays Isaac son of Jurnet 100 shillings, and owes––– William son of Robert de Reidun owes Isaac son of Jurnet £23:—the Stephen de Sparrham now receives from Diaia Franceis half a mark, Philip son of John de Estun pays Isaac son of Jurnet 2 marks and a Gilbert son of Roger de Fransham now receives from Moses son of Eudes de Muleton pays Isaac son of Jurnet thirty shillings, and owes | xxiijrd. January |
| 250 | the norwich day-book. |
| Johannes films Galfridi de Rising’ debet Simoni filio Sarre xxiij solidos |
Februarius | Radulfus filius Godefridi de Irminglonde debet Cipore9 filie Magistri |
iiijo die. | Rogerus filius Odonis modo accipit a Simone filio Sarre xiv solidos |
xj die. | Robertus Lenald de Sweinethorp debet Simoni filio Sarre novem solidos |
xiiij. | Gile de Wechesham solvit Isaac filio Jurneti centum et decem libras et |
xx die. | Henricus Talhmongrir Kipe debet Abrahe filio Mossei xiij solidos ad |
xxiij. | Ricardus filius Eustacii de Saxlingham debet Isaac filio Jurneti duodecim |
Marcius.
| Henricus Kipe Talhmongrir debet Abrahe filio Mossei xvj solidos ad Idem a die quo permisit ultra predictum terminum nullum in lucro |
xviij die. | Willelmus filius Ranulfi de Swerdestun’ fecit finem cum Diaie filio |
the norwich day-book. | 251 |
John son of Geoffrey de Rising owes Simon son of Sarah 23 shillings, |
|
Ralph son of Godfrey de Irminglonde owes Cipora daughter of Master | February |
Roger son of Otho now receives from Simon son of Sarah 14 shillings, | 4th day. |
Robert Lenald of Sweinethorp owes Simon son of Sarah nine shillings at | 11th day. |
Giles de Wechesham pays Isaac son of Jurnet one hundred and ten | 14th. |
Henry [the tallowmonger of Kipe?] owes Abraham son of Moses2 13 | 20th day. |
Richard son of Eustace de Saxlingham owes Isaac son of Jurnet twelve | 23rd. |
Henry of Kipe, tallowmonger, owes Abraham son of Moses 16 shillings The same from the day which he allowed beyond the aforesaid term | March. |
William son of Ranulf de Swerdestun made a fine with Diaia son of | 18th day. |
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 | [Meyr? and so throughout.] |
2 | [Spelt “Mosse” throughout in original.] |
252 | the norwich day-book. |
Ranulfus Champanie finem fecit cum Merino filio Benedicti de Oxonia
per xv solidos et sex denarios primus terminus ad xv pasce anno x tres
solidos ix denarios et obolum et ad pentecostem totidem et ad festum Sancti
Johannis totidem et ad festum Sancti Michaelis totidem et sinon dabit pro
libra tres denarios super terras et catalla.
xxix die. | Alanus de Seniore debet Merino filio Joscei de Oxonia tres marcas ad |
Aprilis. | Johannes filius Roberti de Depham modo accipit a Isaac filio |
ix die. | Petrus filius Willelmi del Frith debet Josceo de Eia xv solidos et dimi- |
Eodem die | Petrus filius Petri Constabularii de Cacalton’ finem fecit cum Benedicto |
xiij die. | Ricardus de Daggeworthe filius Osberti filii Henrici finem fecit cum |
[xxiiij.] | Rogerus et Radulfus fraters de Bernham filio Alani solvunt Isaac filio |
xxvj die | Johannis filius Johannis de Reinestorp solvit Isaac filio duas marcas et |
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 [Sic.]
the norwich day-book. | 253 |
Ranulf Champain made a fine with Merinus son of Benedict de Oxford
for 15 shillings and six pence; the first term at the quindene of Easter in
the 10th year three shillings and ninepence halfpenny; and at Whitsun the
same, and at the feast of St. John the same, and at the feast of St. Michael
the same; and if not, he will give three pence for the pound upon lands and
chattels.
Alan de Senior owes Merinus son of Josce de Oxford three marks at the | 29th day, |
John son of Robert de Depham now receives from Isaac son of Moses 4 | April, |
Peter son of William del Frith owes Josce de Eye 15 shillings and half | 9th day, |
Peter son of Peter the constable of Cacalton made a fine with Benedict | The same |
[Here follows erased entry.] Richard de Daggeworthe son of Osbert son of Henry made a fine with | 13th day. |
Roger and Ralph, brothers of Bernham son of Alan, pay Isaac son of | [24th.] |
John son of John de Reinestorp pays Isaac son [of Jurnet?] two marks | 26th day, |
254 | the norwich day-book. |
[No date.]. | ROLL 145. | |
| Transcript. | |
Junius vij. | Andreas filius Willelmi Wascelin debet Mosseo filio Abrahe sex marcas | |
xxiij | Hubertus de Vallibus finem fecit de debito Aaronis filii Joscei de | |
[xxx | Gilbertus filius Gilberti de Fransham debet Mossco filio Salmonis xv | |
Julius j°. | Johannes del Wra debet Isaac filio Jurneti tres solidos ad festum Sancti | |
xiij. | Radulfus de Dallinger solvit Isaac filio Jurneti xxv solidos et debet Vitalis Braitun Capstanus [sic] debet Regine filie Flurie unam marcam Adam de Bedingfeld’ solvit Aaroni filio Abrahe decem libras et debet xl | |
Augustus | Ricardus filius Philippi Sauringes modo accipit a Isaac filio Jurneti iiij°r | |
x die. | Robertas filius Simonis de Soham debet Jacobo filio Vives de Colecestria | |
the norwich day-book. | 255 |
ROLL 145.
Translation.
Andrew son of William Wascelin owes Moses son of Abraham six marks | June 7th. |
Hubert de Vaux made a fine of the debt of Aaron son of Josce de | 23rd. |
Gilbert son of Gilbert de Fransham owes Moses son of Solomon 15 | [30th.] |
John del Wra owes Isaac son of Jurnet three shillings at the feast of | July 1st. |
Ralph de Dallinger pays Isaac son of Jurnet 25 shillings and owes 27 | 13th. |
Hagin Braitun [chaplain?] owes Regina daughter of Flury one mark Adam de Bedingfeld pays Aaron son of Abraham ten pounds and owes |
|
Richard son of Philip Sauringes now receives from Isaac son of Jurnet | August |
Robert son of Simon de Soham owes Jacob son of Vives de Colchester | l0th day. |
256 | the norwich day-book, |
xiij. | Ricardus de Elington’ aurifaber eidem Jacobo xxxij solidos ad festum |
xviij die | Rogerus filius Philippi de Ho debet Mosseo filio Abrahe et Isaac filio Johannes filius Henrici de Ulvestun’ finem fecit cum Isaac filio Jurneti |
September. | Wolmenus Pigge de Rudenhal’ debet Josceo filio Magistri Merini unam |
viij. | Galfridus filius Ricardi Ruffi de Berchstrete debet Jurnino filio Jacobi Robertus Hakun finem fecit cum Semuret per triginta marcas primus |
xxix die. | Bartholomeus de Crek’ debet Isaac filio Jurneti quatuor viginti et septem |
the norwich day-book. | 257 |
Richard de Elington, goldsmith, to the same Jacob 32 shillings at the | 13th. |
Roger son of Philip de Ho owes Moses son of Abraham and Isaac son of John son of Henry de Ulvestun made a fine with Isaac son of Jurnet | 18th day. |
Woolmene Pigge of Rudenhal owes Josce son of Master Merinus one | Septem- |
Geoffrey son of Richard [the Redl] of Berchstrete owes Jurninus son of Robert Hakun made a fine with Semuret for thirty marks; the first | 8th. |
Bartholomew de Crek owes Isaac son of Jurnet four score and seventeen | 29th day. |
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 [Rous?]
vol. v. | r |
258 | the norwich day-book. |
October. | Johannes filius Roberti de Upham debet [Mosseo] filio Abrahe sexagintæ |
xiiij die. | Willelmus filius Mathei de Gurnai solvit. Isaac filio Jurneti lx solidos et |
| Henricus filius Roberti de . . , debet . . . filio Jacobi ...... |
ROLL 147.
Transcript. 11 Hen. III.
| Annus Undecimus Regni Regis Henrici Filii Regis Johannis Inceptus. |
| Rogerus filius Philippi de Ho debet Mosseo filio Abrahe et Isaac filio |
November | Henricus de Histeldene miles debet Isaac filio Jurneti sexdecim libras. |
xvij. | Robertus filius Simonis de Soham debet Jacobo filio Vives de Colecestria |
xxix. | Johannes de Corn[herde] et Ricardus filius et omnes heredes eorum ex- |
the norwich day- book | 259 |
John son of Robert de Upham owes [Mosse] son of Abraham sixty shil- | October, |
William son of Matthew de Gurnai pays Isaac son of Jurnet 60 shillings | 14th day. |
Henry son of Robert de . . . owes . . . son of Jacob. . . . . . . |
|
ROLL 147.
Translation. 11 Hen. III.
The eleventh year of the reign of King Henry son of King John, begun |
|
Roger son of Philip de Ho owes Moses son of Abraham and Isaac son of |
|
Henry de Histeldene, knight, owes Isaac son of Jurnet sixteen pounds | November. 12th. |
Robert son of Simon de Soham owes Jacob son of Vives de Colchester | 17th. |
John de Corn[herde] and Richard his son and all their heirs except | 29th. |
260 | the norwich day book |
December | Willelmus filius Willelmi le Dene debet Merino filio Benedicti et Elie |
xxiiij, | Johannes filius Roberti de Depham debet Samueli filio Isaac septem |
Januarius Vj. | Ricardus filius Willelmi de Reunham debet Mosseo filio Abrahe per |
x. | Philippus filius Milonis de Hasting’ debet Isaac filio Jurneti duodecim |
| Idem Philippus est quietus per hunc finem de tallia octo librarum et de |
Februarius | Walterus filius Ricardi de Bradenham debet Merino filio Joscei de |
ix. | Godefridus filius Roberti de Salle debet Josceo de Eia triginti solidos et |
| Idem [Rogerus de Verli] debet eidem [Isaac filio Salomonis] tres marcas |
xvj. | Martinus Skerret debet Samueli filio Isaac xx solidos ad festum Trinitalis |
Marcius | Willelmus de Gurnai fecit finem cum Isaac filio Salomonis per tres |
the norwich day book | 261 |
William son of William le Dene owes Merinus son of Benedict and Elias son of Vives twelve shillings, to wit, a moiety to one and another | December |
John son of Robert de Depham owes Samuel son of Isaac seven marks, | 24th. [sic] |
Richard son of William de Reunham owes Moses son of Abraham by | January 6th. |
Philip son of Miles de Hasting’ owes Isaac son of Jurnet twelve pounds; | 10th. |
The same Philip is quit by this fine of a tally of eight pounds, and of |
|
Walter son of Richard de Bradenham owes Merinus son of Josce de | February-7th. |
Godfrey son of Robert de Salle owes Josce de Eye thirty shillings and | 9th. |
The same [Roger de Verli] owes to the same [Isaac son of Solomon] three |
|
Martin Skerret owes Samuel son of Isaac 20 shillings at the feast of | 16th. |
William de Gurnai. made a fine with Isaac son of Solomon for three | March lst day. . |
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 [A Jew’s bond.]
262 | the norwich day book |
xv. | Robertus Curestun’ de Keteringham debet Slemmote filio Vives de |
xxii. | Robertus filius Galfridi pincerne de Hemington’ debet Diaie le Franceis |
xxvj | Ego Andreas Wascelin cognosco quod debeo Aaroni filio Jacobi tres |
April viij. | Agnes uxor Roberti de Briggeham debet Simoni filio Sarre viginti duos |
xv. | Willelmus le Clauer de Stirstun’ finem fecit cum Isaac filio Jurneti per |
| Magister Willelmus de Kentewelle debet Isaac filio Jurneti triginta |
| Idem debet dicto Isaac decern marcas ad xv pasce anno xj. et pro illis |
Mains j die. | Willelmus filius Ernaldi de Finingham debet Diaie Franceis xx solidos |
vij die. | Egidus [sic] de Wechesbam debet Isaac filio Jurneti quatuor viginti et |
xvij. | Robertus le Gris debet Mosseo filio Abrahe ad octavas Sancte Fidis anno |
xxvj. | Vitalis filius Alani de Sancto Edmundi [sic] debet Regine filie Flurie de |
the norwich day book. | 263 |
Robert Curestun of Keteringham owes Slemmote son of Vives de Oxford | 15th. |
Robert son of Geoffrey the butler of Hemington owes Diaia le Franceis | 23rd. |
I Andrew Wascelin acknowledge that I owe to Aaron son of Jacob three | 26th. |
Agnes wife of Robert de Briggeham owes Simon son of Sarah twenty | April 8th. |
William le Claver of Stirstun made a fine with Isaac son. of Jurnet for | 15th. |
Master William de Kentewelle owes Isaac son of Jurnet thirty two |
|
The same owes the said Isaac ten marks at the quindene of Easter in the |
|
William son of Arnold de Finingham owes Diaia Franceis 20 shillings at the feast of St. Martin in the 12th year. | May |
Giles de Wechesham owes Isaac son of Jurnet four score and ten pounds; | 7th day. |
Robert le Gris owes Moses son of Abraham at the octave of St. Faith in | 17th. |
Vitalis son of Alan de St. Edmund’s owes Regina daughter of Flurey de | 26th. |
264 | the norwich day-book |
Junius viij. | Godefridus filius Roberti de Salle debet . . . . . . de . . . . . . Josceo de |
ix. | Frankus de Cheuerenil debet Isaac filio Jurneti sexaginta sex marcas, |
x. | Ricardus Mercator de Saxlingham debet Simoni filio Sarre sex solidos ad |
xj. | Robertus Floteman de Saxlingham debet Damete filie Morel octo solidos |
Julii ij. | Adam filius Willelmi de Bosco de Thornham debet Diaie filie Leon is |
| Robertus filius Rogeri de Nortun’ in libertate Sancti Edmundi debet |
xxij. | Johannes filius Roberti de Lund’ debet Gente filie Isaac de Oxonia octo |
xxv. | Willelmus de Mortemer debet Isaac filio Jurneti decem marcas ad pasca |
Augustus | Henricus de Bedford’ debet Jacobo filio Semuret quinque marcas et |
ix. | Johannes de Theestun’ Capellanus debet Simoni filio Sarre triginta tres |
September | Radulfus de Bruning’ debet Jurnino filio Jacobi xv solidos ad pasca anno |
Sancto | Radulfus de Hirminglond, miles, solvit magistro Merino Chalbard xxv s. |
October vj. | Galfridus de Maltebi et Johannes de Stokesbi debent Merino filio Joscie, |
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 [a?]
the norwich day-book | 265 |
Godfrey son of Robert de Salle owes . . . . . . of . . . . . . to Josce | June 8th. |
Frank do Cheverenil owes Isaac son. of Jurnet sixty six marks; the first | 9th. |
Richard the merchant of Saxlingham owes Simon son of Sarah six | 10th. |
Robert Floteman of Saxlinghani owes Dameta daughter of Morel eight | 11th. |
Adam son of William Wood of Thornham owes Diaia daughter of Leo four | July 2nd. |
Robert son of Roger de Nortun in the liberty of St. Edmund owes |
|
John son of Robert de London owes Genta daughter of Isaac de Oxford | 22nd. |
William de Mortemer owes Isaac son of Jurnet ten marks at Easter in | 25th. |
Henry de Bedford owes Jacob son of Semuret five marks and a half, to | August |
John de Theestun, chaplain, owes Simon son of Sarah thirty three | 9th. |
Ralph de Bruning owes Jurninus son of Jacob 15 shillings at Easter in | September |
Ralph de Hirminglond, knight, pays to Master Merinus Chalbard 25s., | St. |
Geoffrey de Malteby and John de Stokesby owe Merinus son of Josce | October |
266 | the norwich day-book |
xij. | Radulfus Dalling’ wiles mutuo acquisivit a Isaaco filio Diaie decern libras |
xxj. | Egidius de Wechesliam debet Isaac filio Jurneti quater viginti libras |
| FINAL LINE OF ROLL. |
| Respice in tergo. Hac Nota. |
| I. The following is one of three or four entries found in tergo:— |
xxiiij. | “Robertus filius Simonis debet Jacobo filio Vives de Colecestria xiiij |
| II. The following, written in a Chancery hand, nine years after, is to be |
| “Die Veneris proxima clauso Pasche venit quoddam breve cyrographi |
| III. A further brief endorsement is as follows:— “Annus Undecimus Henrici III.” |
| ROLL 157. |
Heading. | Annus Regni Regis Henrici filii Regis Johannis Nonus Mensis Aprilis |
iiijo die. | Galfridus Capellanus de Abbeton’ debet reddere filio Abrahe xvj solidos |
xx. | Thomas de Edithfeld, Aaroni filio Jacobi et Rose sorori sue, vij s. ad |
Maius | Sarra que fuit uxor de Alex[andro] Qwelnetham Isaac filio Jurneti |
xxviij. | Andreas Wascelin, Aaroni filio Jacobi v m. iiij d. ad festum Sancti |
Junius, | Willelmus de Reydon’, Isaac filio Salomon’s viij 1 ad festum Sancti |
the norwich day-book. | 267 |
Ralph Dallinger, knight, acquired by loan from Isaac son of Diaia ten | 12th. |
Giles de Wechesham owes Isaac son of Jurnet four score pounds; the | 21st. |
FINAL LINE OF ROLL. See the Back. Note This. |
|
I. The following is one of three or four entries found:— |
|
“Robert son of Simon owes Jacob son of Vives de Colchester 14s. 5d. at | 24.th. |
II. The following, written in a Chancery hand—nine years after—is to |
|
“On the Friday next after the close of Easter a certain writ of chirograph |
|
III. A further brief endorsement as follows:— “The eleventh year of Henry III.” |
|
ROLL 157. |
|
Translation. 9 Hen. III. |
|
The month of April, the ninth year of the reign of King Henry son of | Heading. |
Geoffrey the chaplain of Abbeton ought to return to the son of Abraham | 4th day. |
Thomas de Edithfeld, to Aaron son of Jacob and Rose his sister, 7s., at | 20th. |
Sarah who was wife of Alexander Qwelnetham to Isaac son of Jurnet | May 26th. |
Andrew Wascelin, to Aaron son of Jacob 5 marks 4d., at the feast of St. | 28th. |
William de Reydon, to Isaac son of Solomon, £8 at the feast of St. | June, the |
268 | the norwich day-book. |
| Willelmus de Kolevill, Isaac de Norwico v m. ad festum Sancti Michaelis |
| Willelmus de Cyreti, Isaac filio Jurneti liiij 1 ad festum Sancti Michaelis |
Julius | Galfridus de Qwelnetham, Isaac filio Jurneti xxxviij 1 ad festum Sancti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
Augustus | Matildis de Tivill’ quietum clamavit Isaac de Norwico se ipsam nihil |
Septem- | Radulfus filius Godefridi de Irmingland, Cypore filie Magistri Meyr |
| Hugo de Lindeseye Abbas de Leyeston’ ejusdem loci conventus Isaac filio |
October. | Alauns de Mundham, Diaie filie Samsonis x 1 vj m. infra viij annos |
| Thomas filius Rudolfi de Hedhill’ Meyr filio Benedicti de Oxonia v m. |
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 Madox:––fui.
the norwich day book | 269 |
William de Kolevill, to Isaac de Norwich 5 marks at the feast of St. |
|
William de Cyreti, to Isaac son of Jurnet £54, at the feast of St. Michael |
|
Geoffrey de Qwelnetham to Isaac son of Jurnet £28; at the feast of . . . . . . . . . . . | July 28th. |
Maude de Tivill quit-claimed herself to Isaac de Norwich to be able to | August |
Ralph son Godfrey de Irmingland, to Cypora daughter of Master Meyer | Septem- |
Hugh de Lindeseye, abbot of Leyeston [and] the convent of the same |
|
Alan de Mundham, to Diaia daughter of Samson £10, 6 marks, within | October |
Thomas son of Rudolf de Hedhill, to Meyer son of Benedict tie Oxford |
|
270 | the norwich day book. |
November. | Willelmus Junerel de Lond’ Isaac filio Jurnoti xxx 1 habet illud cyro- Willelmus filius Arnaldi Diaie filie Leonis xiiij s. ad Natalem xo. |
| Willelmus de Bosco Isaac filio Jurneti xvj 1. dimidiam marcam xij d. ad |
December. | Robertas filius Petri de Sweinstorp Aaroni filio Jacobi xx s. ad Purifica- |
| Johannes filius Herberti Ursello filio Samsonis vij . . . ad festum |
Januarius. | Robertas filius Symonis de Saham Jacobo filio Vivonis de Colecestria iij |
| Willelmus de Morleya Mosseo filio Abrahe c s. ad Pascha anno xj° 1 s. |
| Idem Willelmus, Belasez sorori dicti Mossei xxx s. ad festum Sancti |
Febru- | Magister Radulfus de Thurton’ Aaroni filio Jacobi et Merino filio |
Marcius. | Johannes de Ulveston’ Damete filie Morel’ ij m. ad festum Sancti Petrus de Keteringham Diaie filie Samsonis xj s. Martino anno x°. |
A prilis | Willelmus Coleman Slemote filio Vivonis de Oxonia v m. ad festum |
| Walterus filius Hugonis filii Radulfi de Reydon’ Isaac filio Salomonis xl |
Maius. | Eudo de Heckham Jacobo filio Vivonis de Colecestria iiij 1 x s. ad festum |
Junius. | Willelnms de Elmham parmentarius Mosseo filio Abrahe xxix s. ad |
| Radulfus filius Godefredi de Irmingloud’ Cypore filie Magistri Meyr |
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 | [Comitisse.j |
the norwich day book. | 271 |
William Junerel of London, to Isaac son of Jurnet £30; lie has that | November. |
William son of Arnold, to Diaia daughter of Leo 14s. at Christinas in the |
|
William de Bosco, to Isaac son of Jurnet £16, half a mark, 12d.; at |
|
Robert son of Peter de Sweinatorp, to Aaron son of Jacob 20s. at the | December. |
John son of Herbert to Ursell son of Samson 7 . . .; at the feast of |
|
Robert son of Simon de Saham, to Jacob son of Vivo de Colchester, | January. |
William de Morley to Moses son of Abraham 100s.; at Easter in the |
|
The same William, to Belasez sister of the said Moses, 30s. at the feast |
|
Master Ralph de Thurton, to Aaron son of Jacob and Merinus son of | February. |
John de Ulveston, to Dameta daughter of Morel 2 marks at the feast of | March. |
Peter de Keteringham, to Diaia daughter of Samson lis. at Martinmas in |
|
William Coleman, to Slemote son of Vivo de Oxford 5 marks; at the | April. |
Walter son of Hugh son of Ralph de Reydon, to Isaac son of Solomon |
|
Eudes de Heckham to Jacob son of Vivo de Colchester £4, 10s. at the | May. |
William de Elmham, tailor, to Moses son of Abraham, 29s. at Christmas | June. |
Ralph son of Godfrey de Irminglond’ to Cypora daughter of Master Meyer |
|
272 | the norwich day book |
Julius. | Petrus filius Syrik de Len fecit finem cum Isaac de Norwico per c s, |
Septem- | Henricus de Stowa et Juliana uxor ejus diviseront Lee et Bone sororibus |
October. | Petrus Tregoz Isaac filio Jurneti xij 1 infra x annos. |
November, | Rogerus filius Ricardi de Cringesford’ Flurie filie Diaie filie Samsonis |
December. | Ada de Bedingfeld’, Aaroui filio Abrahe xxx s. |
Januarius | Die Animarum anno xj extrahimus quoddam cyrographum x 1 sub nomine |
| Last membrane—the only one ruled (lead point)—has the following |
| Annus Regni Regis Henrici filii Regis Johannis |
xxiij die | Willelinus filius Willelmi filius Gileberti de Colevill’ Isaac de Norwico |
xxvj. | Magister Willelmus de Kentewell’ Isaac filio Jurneti xxxv. 1, ad quin- |
Martins | Willelmus filius Roberti de Bukeham Mosseo filio Isaac sexaginta x |
1 | Vide Madox, |
the norwich day book. | 273 |
Peter son of Syrik de Len made a fine with Isaac de Norwich for 100s. | July. |
Henry de Stow and Julia his wife divided to Leah and Bona sisters of | Septem- |
Peter Tregoz to Isaac son of Jurnet £12 within 10 years. | October. |
Roger son of Richard de Cringesford to Flury daughter of Diaia daughter | November. |
Adam de Bedingfeld, to Aaron son of Abraham 30s. | December. |
On the day of All Souls in the 11th year we withdraw a certain chiro- | January. |
Last membrane—the only one ruled (lead point)—has the following |
|
The Eleventh year of the reign of King Henry |
|
William son of William son of Gilbert de Colevill to Isaac de Norwich | 23rd day |
Master William de Kentewell to Isaac son of Jurnet £35; at the | 26th. |
William son of Robert de Bukeham to Moses son of Isaac 70 shillings, to | March. |
VOL. V. | S |
274 | the norwich day book |
ix die. | Nicholaus filius Johannis de Mundham Jurnino filio Jacobi de Oxonia |
In Dorso.
Extrahendum est cyrographum xxx s. sub nomine Rogeri filii Johannis
de Swerdeston’ sed nihil ad hue pacavit pro illo.
Magister Willelmus de Kentewell’ cepit unum cyrographum de viginti
quinque libris de area Domini Regis et posuit unum cyrographum infra
aream domini [Regis] de viginti duabus libris et decern solidis vij die Aprilis
[anno]1 Regni Regis Henrici filii Regis Johannis duodecimo et per hoc
dictus Magister Willelmus quietus et heredes sui et fratres ejus et heredes
eorum versus dictum Isaac de Norwico et heredes sui exceptis Istun et
Bungingtun’ ab initio seculi usque ad hunc diem dictum.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1 | Vide Madox. |
the norwich day book. | 275 |
Nicholas son of John | 9th day. |
On the Dorse.
A chirograph of 30s. is to be withdrawn, under the name of Roger son of
John de Swerdeston. But he has hitherto paid nothing for it.
Master William de Kentewell took a chirograph of twenty five pounds
from the chest of the Lord King, and put a chirograph within the chest of
the Lord [King] of twenty two pounds and ten shillings, the 7th day of April
in the twelfth [year] of the reign of King Henry son of King John; and by
this the said Master William is quit and his heirs, and his brothers and their
heirs, towards the said Isaac de Norwich and his heirs, except Istun and
Bumgingtun, from the beginning of the century until this said day.
THE WHITEHALL CONFERENCE
CELEBRATION OF THE 250th ANNIVERSARY
Under the auspices of the Jewish Historical Society a banquet was given
on February 5, 1906, at the Hotel Great Central to celebrate the 250th
anniversary of the Whitehall Conference, which fell on December 4,1905.
Mr. Lucien Wolf was in the Chair, and there were also present :—
The Chief Rabbi and Mrs. Adler, the Rev. M. and Mrs. Adler, the
Rev. L. and Mrs. Geffen, the Rev. Prof. Dr. H. and Mrs. Gollancz, the
Rev. S. Levy (Hon. Secretary) and Miss Levy, the Rev. I. and Mrs.
Samuel, the Rev. S. and Mrs. Singer, the Rev. D. and Mrs. Wasserzug, the
Revs. S. A. Adler, W. Levin, and M. Rosenbaum, the Earl of Crewe (then
Lord President of the Council, now Secretary of State for the Colonies),
Lord Rothschild, Sir Israel and Lady Hart, Sir Henry and Lady Prim-
rose, Sir Isidore and Lady Spielmann, Sir Edward Sassoon, the Hon.
Sir Eric Barrington, K.C.B., the Right Hon. J. Bryce, M.P. (then
Chief Secretary for Ireland, now Ambassador to the U.S.A.), Prof.
I. Gollancz, Prof. J. K. Laughton, Dr. H. and Mrs. Dutch, Dr. M. and
Mrs. Friedeberger, Dr. S. A. and Mrs. Hirsch, Dr. G. W. and Mrs.
Prothero, Dr. J. and Mrs. Snowman, Dr. A., Mrs., and Miss Wolff,
Drs. G. Schorstein, B. Morris, and C. Singer, Mesdames A. Davis,
J. Dreyfus, Edelmann, M. Friedländer, A. Gabriel, Goodman, H. Hart,
Haysack, Jacobs, Otterbourg, M. Salaman, Schubach, Sebag-Montefiore,
L. Wolf, R. Zellner, the Misses Abady, Abrahams, D. Abrahams,
N. Adler, M. Benjamin, Benzian, Laura Davis, Franklin, Carmel Gold-
smid, Gollancz, Goodman, Cécile Hartog, Haysack, M. Haysack,
Hyamson, Jacobs, Klingenstein, Dorothea Landau, I. Levy, L. Levy,
Lorensa Levy, N. Lloyd, Mendes da Costa, Myers, Phillips, D. S. Phillips,
G. I. Phillips, R. Phillips, Rothbarth, R. Tuck, Z. Tuck, Violet, Wein-
berg, Wolf, Mr. and Mrs. I. Abrahams, Mr. and Mrs. L. Abrahams,
Mr. and Mrs. A. L. Birnstingl, Mr. and Mrs. Herman Cohen, Mr. and
276
the whitehall conference. | 277 |
Mrs. N. L. Cohen, Mr. Harold Cox, M.P., and Mrs. Cox. Mr. and Mrs.
Israel Davis, Mr. and Mrs. A. E. Franklin, Mr. and Mrs. E. L. Franklin,
Mr. and Mrs. F. S. Franklin, Mr. and Mrs. M. A. Green, Mrs. H. M.
Hyams, Mr. and Mrs. S. Japhet, Mr. and Mrs. Moritz Joseph, Mr. and
Mrs. A. Levine, Mr. and Mrs. G. Levy, Mr. and Mrs. Harry R. Lewis,
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Maizels, Mr. and Mrs. Mendes da Costa, Mr. and
Mrs. J. M. Mitchell, Mr. and Mrs. L. S. Montagu, Mr. and Mrs. S.
Moses, Mr. and Mrs. P. G. Phillips, Mr. and Mrs. S. J. Phillips, Mr.
and Mrs. S. Rosenbaum, Mr. and Mrs. D. Singer, Mr. S. J. Solomon,
R.A., and Mrs. Solomon, Mr. and Mrs. M. A. Spielmann, Mr. and Mrs.
C. Stettauer, Mr. and Mrs. Hermann Strauss, Mr. and Mrs. Joseph
Trenner, Mr. and Mrs. A. Tuck, Mr. and Mrs. Gustave Tuck, Mr. and
Mrs. H. Tuck, Mr. and Mrs. A. M. Wartski, Mr. and Mrs. J. L. Wartski,
Mr. and Mrs. B. B. Weil, Mr. and Mrs. E. Wilner, Mr. and Mrs.
Mortimer Woolf, and Mr. and Mrs. I. Zangwill; Mons. Armand Garreau,
Mons. Adrien Garreau, Messrs. D. H. Aaron, N. H. Aaron, E. N. Adler,
M. Bender, A. A. Cahen, B. Chissick, C. Waley Cohen, L. L. Cohen,
S. H. Davids, 0. E. D’Avigdor-Goldsmid, D. Davis, W. Dreyfus,
L. A. Fouques, S. Gabriel, E. M. Gollancz, M. Gollancz, J. Hart,
P. J. Hartog, A. M. Hyamson (Hon. Secretary), L. Jacob, A. Josaphat,
N. S. Joseph, A. Joseph, A. Kaufmann, B. Kisch, A. Klingenstein,
G. Klingenstein, W. Klingenstein, H. Landau, S. Lehmann, H. Levy,
J. H. Levy, G. C. Lewis, J. Livingstone, M. Maizels, B. Metz, I. Morris,
S. Morris, Horatio Myer, M.P., A. Myers, M. Myers, J. Neuhöfer,
A. Newman, E. A. Phillips, Clement I. Salaman, J. E. Salmon, Stuart
M. Samuel, M.P., H. Sandheim, C. Sebag-Montefiore, R. M. Sebag-
Montefiore, L. Simons, I. Solomons, M. Spielmann, E. Sternheim,
M. Strauss, H. R. Tedder, L. Tuck, R. Tuck, C. Van Biema, E. Vre-
denburg, I. Weinberg, H. Wilenski, L. Wohlgemuth, E. Wolf, C. Wolf,
G. Wolf, and M. Wolfish.
The Chairman, in proposing the toast of “The King,” said: My
first privilege is to call upon you to drink to the health of His Most
Gracious Majesty the King. At no time is this toast a mere formality
in the Anglo-Jewish community, but to-night this great festival of
Religious Liberty invests it with special significance. To all English-
men, the King is the gracious embodiment of free institutions which are
the pride of the nation and the envy of the world : but to us Jews, His
278 | the whitehall conference. |
Majesty is more especially the sympathetic personification of the liberty-
loving instincts of the British people to which we owe, more than to the
letter of any statute, the fair play we have enjoyed in this happy land.
I give you the health of His Most Gracious Majesty the King..
The Chairman, in giving the second royal toast, said: Our next
toast is that of “Her Majesty the Queen, the Prince and Princess of
Wales, and other members of the Royal Family.” For me to dwell on
the virtues of Her Majesty and on the exemplary lives and public spirit
of the Princes and Princesses of her kindred would be to translate into
very inadequate prose an eloquence which fills all your hearts. This
eloquence is touched to-night by a sad emotion—a feeling of profound
sympathy with Her Majesty in the severe bereavement she has recently
sustained. The full measure of this bereavement she alone can know;
but we trust she will find comfort in the abiding and quickened love of
the nation of which Her Majesty is the brightest ornament. I give
you the health and happiness of Her Majesty Queen Alexandra, the
Prince and Princess of Wales, and the other members of their illustrious
House.
The Chairman, in submitting the toast of the evening, “The
Memory of the Whitehall Conference,” said that before he proposed the
toast he wished to read two letters which he selected from a large
number offering congratulations to them on that anniversary, and
apologies for not being able to assist in the festivity. The first was
from the late Prime Minister and was in the following terms:—
4 Carlton Gardens, S.W.
February 5, 1906.
Dear Mr. Wolf,—I am sorry that I am not able to attend your banquet
to-night and to express orally instead of by writing my sentiments on the
interesting occasion which you are engaged in celebrating. Had Continental
Europe followed the example set by this country for the last two hundred
and fifty years its history would not be stained by many crimes and many
injustices which now stand on record as a perpetual reproach to Christian
civilisation. That in this country there is no Jewish question, that race
prejudices and religious prejudices, which elsewhere play so disastrous a part
in the social organisation, are unheard of here, is due in no small measure to
the fact that the Jews have shown themselves entirely worthy of the rights
and privileges which they enjoy as citizens of this country, and that those
rights and privileges have been granted to them in full measure. Long may
the whitehall conference. | 279 |
these conditions prevail. Long may they bear all the good fruit which they
have so abundantly produced in the past.
Yours very truly,
Arthur James Balfour.
They had also received the letter which President Roosevelt had
addressed to the sister Society, the Jewish Historical Society of America,
which celebrated the 250th of the resettlement of the Jews in America
at the proper time, while they had postponed their celebration owing to
the mourning for their brethren in Russia.1 Mr. Wolf continued: In
the order of ideas to which this toast belongs, the letters I have just read
should properly come last, for they bear testimony—a testimony we
could not, with propriety, proffer ourselves—to the happy dénouement of
a story of which the Whitehall Conference was the opening chapter. I
need not repeat to you the familiar details of that striking chapter of
our history. They live, and I hope they will live for ever in the hearts
of the Jewish people. But perhaps you will permit me to dwell for a
few moments upon one or two aspects of the famous Conference, which
have some bearing on the flattering estimates of our career in this
country, which I read to you a moment ago. Historical critics have
differed as to the exact legal value of the work performed by the White-
hall Conference. I have always regarded the controversy which has
raged round this question as meticulous and unessential, for the reason
that in what it admittedly did and what it admittedly left undone, the
Conference not only gave the Jews a foothold in this country, but even
created the favourable conditions in which their subsequent history was
developed. It is true that the one thing it did—the opinion it extracted
from the judges as to the Jewish right of incoming—was not a con-
stitutional act, and that it was even regarded with disappointment by
the Jews themselves, who would have preferred a formal parliamentary
statute. But it is also beyond question that that opinion was regarded
by the Protectorate Government as sufficiently authoritative, and that in
virtue of it our forefathers began to settle in the land. It is also un-
questionable that it remained a permanent charter of residence for the
new community, and the reason of this was precisely because it was not
a formal Act of Parliament. We must remember that an Act would
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1See p. 304, below, for President Roosevelt’s letter. |
280 | the whitehall conference. |
have become void with the Restoration, while the decision of the Con-
ference, being merely an interpretation of the law as it then stood, was
independent of the political vicissitudes of an exceptionally stormy and
insecure age. This is one of the reasons why we must look back upon
the Whitehall Conference with gratitude. But there is another reason.
The Conference was not only asked to pronounce on the right of in-
coming; it was also invited to suggest terms on which the residence of
the Jews should be permitted. On this latter question it arrived at no
decision, chiefly because it was dissolved by the Protector as soon as it
manifested a disposition to make recommendations of an intolerant and
oppressive character. Here is a second reason for our gratitude, and
one, perhaps, of greater weight than the first. There can be no question
that it saved us from the Ghetto system then in force all over Europe.
We consequently owe to it, in a very large measure, the fact that our
social assimilation with our non-Jewish fellow-citizens is, and has always
been, far more complete in this country than in any other country, and
that, as a result, the baleful wave of anti-Semitism which has swept
across the Continent, has dashed impotently against our shores. We
owe to it, too, the solid foundations on which our rights as British
citizens rest, for those rights were not granted to us by political theorists,
in homage to some abstract doctrine of human equality, but were won
for us by our Christian fellow-countrymen, who, in unimpeded inter-
course with our fathers, had insensibly abjured the prejudices and
superstitions on which Jewish disabilities rested. Thus, the Whitehall
Conference not only opened the way to the resettlement of the Jews in
this country, but gave them—unconsciously, it is true—an opportunity
of vindicating their race such as has not been enjoyed by any other
Jewish communities except, perhaps, those of the South of France and
Amsterdam, and then only in a minor degree. These aspects of the
famous Conference are, of course, of great moment to the Jewish com-
munity and its historians, but, in relation to the present celebration, it
must be confessed that they are somewhat narrow. It is not by such a
chapter of accidents that the imagination is fired, and it is certainly not
on their account alone that we are assembled here to-night. We are
here to celebrate the spirit and not the form. What we hail in the
Whitehall Conference is the great thought to which it owed its existence,
the idea of religious liberty which was then for the first time struggling
the whitehall conference. | 281 |
into the domain of practical politics in this country. It was a struggle
full of dramatic and momentous interest. We cannot say that the
England of the Commonwealth was honestly tolerant. There was much
cry of Religious Liberty, but very little real Toleration. “This hath
been one of the vanities of our contest,” said Cromwell once with bitter-
ness. “Every sect saith, ‘Oh, give me liberty,’ but give it to him and
his power, he will not yield it to anybody else.” This was a true picture
of the religious strife of the times. Nevertheless, through it all the
people were groping for the light, and the lesson of Toleration was
gradually forcing itself on the public conscience, if for no other reason
than that in the mêlée of the zealots the persecutors of one day often
became the persecuted of the next. Men were beginning to see that not
only was Toleration necessary within the limits of the “Instrument of
Government,” but that even beyond the Christian pale it could not, in
justice, be refused. Of this great moral awakening the Whitehall Con-
ference was an impressive and memorable manifestation. Forty years
before Locke wrote his famous letters “On Toleration,” it made an effort
to give practical effect, in one direction at least, to Locke’s theory of
unrestricted Liberty of Conscience. Its purpose, as conceived by
Cromwell, was half a century ahead of liberal theory, and anticipated
liberal practice by nearly a century and a half. For this reason the
Conference was epoch-making, not only in Jewish, but also in English,
history. It widened the scope of the struggle for freedom; it postulated
for the first time the true limitations of that struggle, and by the practi-
cal contribution it made towards it, in the shape of the Jewish settle-
ment, it insured its ultimate triumph. As we look back to-night through
the long vista of two and a half centuries which separates us from these
momentous happenings, two figures fill the field of our mental vision—
Cromwell, the great-hearted Protector, and Menasseh ben Israel, the
devoted Jew. They were the authors of the historic Conference whose
memory we are now celebrating. It was their spirit of toleration and
justice which invested it with all it had of dignity and usefulness. We
dwell upon these figures to-night with pride and gratitude. They are
the figures of a Christian and a Jew, standing together in the dawn of
English liberty, twin champions of a wronged people, and heralds of a
free state. It is a picture on which we do well to dwell, for it typifies
our partnership in the noble strivings of a great people—a partnership
282 | the whitehall conference. |
which has happily endured to our own day, and which in its stability
and fruitfulness serves as a beacon of toleration and liberty to the dark
places that still linger on the face of God’s earth. I give you the
memory of the Whitehall Conference.
The Right Hon. James Bryce, M.P., in proposing “Prosperity to
the Anglo-Jewish community,” said: I am honoured by having the duty
thrown upon me of proposing the toast of “Prosperity to the Anglo-
Jewish community,” and I am very sensible of that honour. I am asked
to couple with it three names eminently representative of the community,
and well-qualified to answer for it on an occasion like this. The first is
the name of your ecclesiastical head, the honoured and respected son of
an honoured and venerated father, a man who adds the glory of learning
to the respect and regard which the judicious and kindly discharge of his
duties has won from all of you. He is known and respected by all
Londoners far beyond the limits of his own community. I am also asked
to couple the toast with the name of Lord Rothschild. His father fought
for you, in days long gone by, the battle of civil and religious liberty, and
he himself, by his enlightened philanthropy and energy on behalf of the
cause of his co-religionists everywhere, has laid the whole Jewish com-
munity under a sense of deep gratitude. As he represents the House of
Lords, to which our late Queen called him on the recommendation of
Mr. Gladstone, more than twenty years ago, so the third gentleman with
whose name I couple this toast, Sir Edward Sassoon, is one of those who
represent the Jewish community in the House of Commons, where we have
known and liked him for many years. He is to speak for your ancient
Sephardic Congregation. This occasion is one of very great interest, not
only to yourselves, but to those guests whom you have kindly invited here
from the Christian bodies of England. You have fitly asked us to a dinner
of an Historical Society, and one feels a significant appropriateness in our
coming to an occasion of that kind, because there can be no intelligent
Englishman, no intelligent citizen of the modern world, who does not
feel an interest in your history. It is the longest history recorded.
We peoples of the West are mere mushroom creatures of yesterday
compared with you. Our nations appear quite a modern growth com-
pared to a nation which dates far back beyond the beginnings of any
history in Europe, and the length of its annals is such that we have to
go for. a parallel to countries like China and Japan. And, as your
the whitehall conference. | 283 |
history is the longest, so also it is in many ways the history that has
affected the world most. It is not political history that is the true
kernel of history. Politicians come and pass, and only a few of the very
greatest statesmen and conquerors leave permanent marks behind them.
The true history of the world, the history which has governed and ruled
the minds of men most is the history of literature and religion. Your
literature and the religion of which you were the first depositaries have
been the most powerful factors in the life of civilised mankind; they
have exercised a most profound and deep influence, especially through
their poetry. That so large a part of your literature is cast into a
poetical form is one of the factors which make it a world-literature,
which make it at home among all peoples, and in every country. It
has sunk into the thought of the whole of the civilised world. Greek
literature, perhaps, can show a greater range and variety, but it has not
the intensity of the Hebrew literature, and has not affected to anything
like the same extent the whole mass of mankind. For ten centuries—
from the fifth to the fifteenth—the literature written by Jews in the Old
and New Testaments was practically the only formative influence which
played on the mind of Europe. Is there anything more singular and
curious in history than that the ancient war-songs of the Hebrew king, the
68th and the 110th Psalms, written to be sung by martial tribes, who moved
to meet their enemies across the craggy hills of Palestine, should have
become the war-songs of the “Waldenses in Italy and the Covenanters in
Scotland in the seventeenth century, and should to-day be chanted by
white-robed choristers in the cathedrals of England? To a history like
that there is no parallel, and the Englishman would be dull and ignorant
indeed who did not feel the keenest and deepest interest in the preser-
vation and welfare and prosperity of a community like yours here in
England. Your Chairman has, with great learning, in some of his
writings, and more briefly this evening, brought before us two aspects of
that memorable event when the great soul of Oliver Cromwell saw that
it was right to give your ancestors permission to settle here in England,
moved by his love for the literature of the Old Testament, a puritan
feeling which has lived among the Puritans of England ever since.
There was mixed with that love a shrewd practical sense which has
been often found among the Puritans in all countries. And when I
think of all that has passed within these 250 years, and how your
284 | the whitehall conference. |
community has slowly grown in wealth and prosperity, and how more
and more it has won the respect of the great nation in the midst of which
it lives, I think we may say that nowhere in the modern world have the
Jews found so tranquil and peaceful a home as here in this England of
ours. We Englishmen are very proud of that. As it is said that where
two people or two nations fall out there are usually faults on both sides,
so may it be said that where two races agree and live in peace and amity
there are merits on both sides. We English will claim this for our-
selves. Sixty years ago, when Alderman Salomons and Baron Lionel de
Rothschild were fighting for the admission of the Jews to Parliament,
the Liberal Party, led by Lord John Russell, and true to the principles
of religious liberty, fought for your admission, and ever since there has
been a general feeling of satisfaction and pleasure that that liberty was
given to you, and you have been admitted, in all respects, on equal
terms with other Englishmen to every right, privilege, office, and
emolument in this country. And, on the other hand, you have shown
you have appreciated what our people were willing to do. You entered
into public life, into local bodies, and into both Houses of Parliament,
and you have shown yourselves anxious for the welfare and greatness
of England. You have identified yourselves with our national aims,
and shown a liberal philanthropy to our charitable objects, as well as
your own. You have given us many men of great distinction. You
have not, indeed, given us any great philosopher like Spinoza, whom
you gave to Holland, nor a musician like Mendelssohn and Brahms,
whom you gave to Germany, no great classical or historical scholar
like Bernays and Jaffe, whom, again, you gave to Germany. But
you have given us men who have shone and distinguished themselves
in practical life. You gave us a famous statesman about whom there
may remain some differences of opinion, but whose greatness and
brilliance no one denies. You gave us a great mathematician in
Sylvester, a great economist in Ricardo, many famous lawyers, of
whom I remember several, and one of whom in particular deserves to
be ranked among the three or four greatest judges of England in the
nineteenth century, Sir George Jessel. And how many more you have
given us, who did not always remain in your community, but who were
brilliant and striking members of English literary and political life,
time would fail me to say. The late Mr. James Russell Lowell asserted
the whitehall conference. | 285 |
that nearly all the eminent literary and artistic men of the last two
centuries had been of Jewish stock. He was certain about Rousseau,
very nearly about Voltaire, and he was positive about Goethe. He
adopted a view which has been largely held that two distinguished
English poets also belonged to you—Robert Browning and Matthew
Arnold, and he added incidentally that he was half a Jew himself. He
had several easy means of proving it, first by names, secondly by faces,
and thirdly by intellectual characteristics. The last criterion is obviously
very elastic, and I may say, in passing, that Lowell included among
English statesmen of Jewish descent all the Foxes and all the Russells.
We English ought certainly to be the very last people not to welcome
the coming of other stocks among ourselves. We are a mixed race, and
we have gained by every mixture. We are glad to see you settled
among us, to see you happy, contented, prosperous, mingling with us
socially, while retaining your own internal life and organisation. I
confess I am one of those who cannot avoid the sentimental wish
that somewhere in the world, if not in Palestine, there still should be
a Jewish nation reorganised as such. But, apart from those aspirations,
I hope your community will remain and abide, and flourish among us
in England. I hope your prosperity may increase. I hope you may
still contribute your share of active work in building up the greatness
of our country. I hope also that between you and the great nation
which has been glad to receive you there may always remain that good
feeling and mutual respect which ever since the days of Cromwell have
characterised our relations, and which have been honourable both to the
Jews and to the English. I ask you to drink “Prosperity to the Anglo-
Jewish Community.”
The Chief Rabbi, in reply, said: I am lost in admiration at the
splendid eloquence with which my Right Hon. friend has proposed
the toast which is so dear and precious to us. But whilst I followed
his stately periods with rapt attention I now painfully feel I am unable
to follow him. And yet I dare not hold my peace this evening. I must
do justice to one whose humble successor I am, to that great and good
rabbi, Menasseh ben Israel, that staunch champion of justice and
toleration to whom the readmission of the Jews to these shores is due.
Our predominant sentiment this evening must be that of profound
gratitude that we have been enabled to settle again within these blessed
286 | the whitehall conference. |
shores. Poets and prose-writers of every age have vied With each other
in singing the praises of England. They have extolled England for her
natural beauty, her inexhaustible resources, her brilliant achievements
on land and by sea, her glorious literature. But it is not these that are
the only, not even the primary motives that prompt our love and
admiration. They are not the chief elements of England’s greatness.
The secret of England’s moral greatness is that her rule is based upon
those eternal principles of justice and toleration first enunciated in our
sacred scriptures, that her rule is based on that righteousness which
alone exalteth a nation and, therefore, wherever peoples are gathered
beneath the British flag they thrive and prosper under its ample folds.
Hence justice flourishes, civilisation advances, and humanity is lord of all.
It is the land where, girt by friend or foe—
“A man may speak the thing he will,
A land of settled government,
A land of free and old renown,
Where freedom slowly broadens down
From precedent to precedent.”
The great advantage of celebrations such as this is that they make the
past live again. There was a good old lady who once said that she
could not for the life of her understand why people made such a fuss
of history. “Why not let bygones be bygones?” The Jewish
Historical Society of England and my Right Hon. friend, whom we
still rejoice to call Professor Bryce, do not hold this view. On an
evening like the present there starts before our minds the memory of
that small handful of Marranos who assembled together in mortal dread
of discovery, huddled in a small oratory in a subterranean cellar in
Creechurch Lane in terrible fear of their hostile surroundings, which
the Chairman has described with such mastery of research and such
great vividness. How wonderful are the strides made by our community
since then! The number of synagogues in the British Empire is above
two hundred. I will not speak of those organisations which reflect
so much honour on their founders and their managers. I will not speak
of the devoted men and women who manage our charities and schools.
But we have ever regarded it as our greatest privilege to work with our
fellow-countrymen in trying to mitigate every form of human suffering
and human need. We rejoice that it has been our privilege to serve our
the whitehall conference. | 287 |
country, whether it be in Parliament, at the University, at the Bar,
in literature, art and science, though we do not claim all the names
which Professor Bryce has brought before us. It is a matter for
rejoicing that one of the youngest members of the community should
now be helping to bear the burden of the Home Office and that another
represents His Majesty in the far-off colony of Hong-kong, and that we
have shed our blood for our Sovereign and our country and thus have
proved ourselves worthy of our citizenship. But it seems to me that
we should be living in a fool’s paradise were we not to perceive certain
perils that confront us. It needs not much keenness of sight to discern
that there are, unhappily, signs of great lack of spirituality and earnest-
ness in some quarters, that there is a regrettable want of true enthusiasm
for the highest English and the highest Jewish ideals. Time was when
we thought that the Karaites formed a great peril to our religion.
At the present time I am rather inclined to think that the greatest
danger comes to us from those people whom we may term the Don’t-
careites, those who are ashamed of their Judaism, whereas in reality
Judaism is ashamed of them. And yet, at no time in our history
was there a greater need for strenuous and whole-hearted activity.
The clouds which darken the lot of our hapless brethren in Russia,
those clouds which prevented the earlier celebration of this anniversary,
have not yet passed away. We must work heart and soul to render the
state of our brethren in hapless Russia at least tolerable. We must
above all seek to find resting-places for the poor, wretched fugitive.
How many are the problems that confront us! We look forward with
considerable misgivings to the inevitable modification of the Education
Act. I do not presume to speak in the name of the community, but
I think I am voicing the opinion of the majority, when I say that the
great bulk of us would regard the compulsory secularisation of the
schools as a great peril threatening our dear land. We ardently hope
our denominational schools will be preserved—those schools which have
been reared, endowed, and maintained for the sake of principles very
sacred and very dear to us. We do hope that in the Council Schools
the same facilities which have hitherto been granted to us, and which we
have surely not abused, may be preserved to us. We shall, of course,
acquiesce in whatever may be the decision of Parliament. We do not
intend becoming passive-resisters. It is not my intention to seek
288 | the whitehall conference. |
temporary hospitality in one of His Majesty’s prisons. I would say
this in conclusion. If we would preserve our religious prosperity and
our spiritual and material well-being, the one thing needful for us is
that we may cherish the high ideals of England—toleration, civil and
religious liberty—we must ever preserve with unalterable fidelity those
high, those inspiring principles laid down by our Judaism. Nought
shall make us rue if England—if Anglo-Jewry—to itself do rest
but true.
Lord Rothschild said: It is always very difficult to address such
a large assemblage as the present one. It is more difficult, on this
occasion, because I have to speak after the delivery of two very eloquent
speeches. I do not intend to take up much of your time, and I hope
Mr. Wolf will not think it ungracious of me if I venture to remark that
I should have preferred that the toast so eloquently given by Mr. Bryce
had not been the prosperity of the Anglo-Jewish community, but that
of civil and religious liberty throughout the world. The readmission
of those of the Jewish faith to England was a very important event for
Jews, but it was only a very small episode in that great struggle for
civil and religious liberty which began with the refusal to pay Ship
Money and ended with the trial of the bishops and the flight of James.
From that time forward the cause of civil and religious liberty was
omnipotent in this country. It may appear strange to many of you
that although Jews were admitted to England 250 years ago, a long
period of history elapsed before any of Jewish name and faith were
associated with English public life. That was not owing to any
hostility, as far as I can make out, to those of the Jewish faith; but
with the expulsion of the Stuart monarchs from these islands, Acts
were passed against civil and religious liberty which were supposed to be
in favour of religious liberty, and tests were imposed on all those who
took part in public life. Many not of the Protestant religion served the
throne, and the Government had to get an annual act of indemnity
passed. It was only in 1826 that that great statesman Lord John
Russell, whose whole life was a fight for religious liberty, got the Test
and Corporation Acts repealed. It is a very curious fact that the repeal
of the Test and Corporation Acts, which allowed all those not of the
Protestant faith to serve the State, imposed a fresh obstacle on those
of the Jewish faith, because it was only in 1826 that the House of
the whitehall conference. | 289 |
Lords added the words “On the true faith of a Christian” to the oath
of allegiance, and it was not until forty years after that that Jews were
enabled to take their seats in Parliament. I have gone into the historical
part of this question, not because I thought it would interest you par-
ticularly, but because I acknowledge that the Jews who have lived in
England and become Englishmen have long enjoyed civil and religious
liberty to the full, and having enjoyed that liberty have become good
Englishmen, fond of their adopted country, and anxious to serve the
State, both in a private and public capacity. The reason why I said
I wished this toast had been that of civil and religious liberty all over
the world is because I feel that if those of our faith who live in distant
countries could enjoy the privilege of civil and religious liberty they
would likewise become good citizens of their country, delighted to live
there, and to serve the State as faithfully as we desire to do. If they
enjoyed civil and religious liberty in their lands, we here should be
spared the sorrow and anguish which we experience when we hear of
their sufferings and misfortunes. I thank Mr. Bryce for the kindly way
in which he proposed the toast, and you for so cordially responding to it.
Sir Edward Sassoon, M.P. said: I should like to be allowed to
add my humble meed of gratitude, and to indorse those sentiments of
praise and high and well-deserved admiration bestowed on my Eight
Hon. friend for that splendid, brilliant, and incisive speech with
which he has favoured us this evening. I am all the more grateful
for that utterance, and for the sentiments incorporated in it, because
we know in the House of Commons that Professor Bryce is looked upon
as a shining light, as one deeply versed in constitutional law, and con-
spicuously erudite in political matters. It has been well said that
what Mr. Bryce does not know is not worth knowing. It almost
seems a task of redundancy and supererogation to thank Mr. Bryce
for these excellent sentiments, after the delivery of speeches by the
Chief Rabbi and Lord Rothschild, both of whom have spoken with an
authority which is unchallenged, with an experience both ripe and
vigorous to which I make no pretension to lay any sort of claim. But
it may not altogether be inappropriate that that section of our com-
munity which rejoices in the generic title of Sephardim should have
some vocal and organic representation at this memorable banquet.
For, as you must be very well aware, this is a privilege which I
VOL. V. | T |
290 | the whitehall conference. |
very highly prize—to be enabled to voice the feelings of that time-
honoured, but, I fear, somewhat attenuated, sister congregation, to
speak at this commemoration of the remarkable event which occurred
250 years ago, when, under the leadership of that enterprising and
progressive rabbi, Menasseh ben Israel, we received our first charter
of resettlement and freedom. Menasseh was the right sort of man,
a stout-hearted clergyman, who did not allow himself to be hindered
by disheartening counsels of despair, but plodded along and had the
gratification of receiving, at the hands of that sagacious and far-seeing
statesman, Cromwell, the early and initial stages of that ordered
emancipation of religious tolerance to which reference has been made.
We of the Anglo-Jewish brotherhood have now nothing to envy our
Christian fellow-citizens for, except to hope that we may go one
better than they in furthering the aims of humanity, benevolence, and
civil progress. Surrounded by so many of our Christian fellow-citizens,
who have come to offer evidence of their goodwill, we only ask that
we may be allowed to continue to share in their civic duties, to further
the consolidation of our great Empire, and to participate in our common
privileges. I have alluded to the different sections of our community.
Owing to some disparity of ritual and differences in pronunciation, which
in themselves may be insignificant, but to which I myself attach the
utmost importance, we are technically apart, and we Sephardim have not
yet been submerged by the advancing billows of the German Ocean. But
we stand together as one man in every matter that conduces to the social
and moral welfare of our Jewish race, and in everything that concerns
and practically affects the prestige and fair name of Judaism. We have
several institutions, the aim and object of which is to manumit the
oppression of our brethren abroad, to raise them in the scale of civilisa-
tion, and assist them to a higher level. The Chief Rabbi has referred
to the dark and lowering clouds of confessional bigotry, and to the per-
petually recurring periods of unreasoning fanaticism which unfortunately
are so rife in many portions of Europe, but which leave us unscathed.
We have even remained untouched by the aftermath of persecution,
which, under the cloak and guise of religious fervour, produces effects
utterly repulsive and repellent to the best doctrines, the inspirations,
the precepts of Christianity. Therefore, I think, a community and
religious confraternity which has been able successfully to repel all
the whitehall conference. |